On Nov 25, 2009, at 3:18 am, Dan Kubb (dkubb) wrote: >> is this intentional? > > Not in this case. In other cases we've been somewhat strict, > especially in the DSL layer where it's important to specify behaviour > explicitly, but something like this we would generally want to handle > in DM.
I'm not sure. Devil's advocate: The case when no parameters are supplied feels to me like something that should be handled at the boundary of the application ... otherwise, isn't there a risk of user interface logic filtering down through the app? I'd be interested to hear opinions. Ashley -- http://www.patchspace.co.uk/ http://www.linkedin.com/in/ashleymoran -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to datamap...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to datamapper+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en.
