Hi Jordan On 2 Sep., 04:05, Jordan Ritter <[email protected]> wrote: > Gernot, > > While there may be syntactically better ways to construct your > particular DM queries, I don't necessarily think you're going about it all > wrong. The truth is that the current logic behind generating JOINs for many > sophisticated (multi-table) join scenarios is plain broken. >
Any hints how I could use better syntax? > The good news is that it just so happens there's a recent/current discussion > + forked branch or two focused on refactoring the Query/JOIN construction > logic. The bad news is it probably won't be production ready any time soon. > YMMV, but I've personally resigned myself to using raw SQL in these sorts of > performance-is-important scenarios. > Could you give me a hint where I can find those forks? Thank you ver much for your opinions and suggestions. Gernot -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en.
