Yes, I've noticed this while I've debugged my way into the guts of both. They kinda instatiate their databases very deep down, and it will require a bit of hacking around to make them talk to each other. DataObjectsAdapter from dm-do-adapter/adapter.rb should do it on the DM-side.
We'll see how this is needed. After making only the few tests that need both frameworks use it the disk database, I managed to bring back the full test time down to 13 seconds. Hacking Sequel will probably need more justification than 4 seconds. On Sep 17, 3:18 am, Markus Schirp <[email protected]> wrote: > Sequel supports DataObjects while DataMapper does too. You should be > able to hook into Sequel or DataMamapper and inject eigther DataMappers > do instance in Sequel or the other way round... > > Regards, > > Markus > > On 09/17/2010 01:56 AM, Daniel Ribeiro wrote: > > > Is there a way to share the same in memory sqlite3 database? I am > > using Sequel for raw queries, where DM is really lacking, but they > > can't work toguehter unless they share a physical database (which > > pumps our tests from 7 seconds to unbearable 47). > > > Regards, > > - Daniel -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en.
