G'day Xavier we've been using your code. >From memory the SHA256 generated save point names caused a truncation warning in postgres (dunno if it's only in specific versions) because they are too long. We ended up explicitly naming our save points and defaulting to a UUID instead I think.
Cheers, Shane. On Sep 27, 1:14 am, Xavier Shay <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello, > > I currently have this hack to get nested transactions in > postgres:http://gist.github.com/324022 > > I'm looking at cleaning it up as an actual patch. From what I can > tell, this needs to touch data_objects, do_postgres, and dm- > transactions. I've sketched out where I think things go in the > following gist:http://gist.github.com/598001 > > I've left comments in the gist as to specific questions. I'd > appreciate some feedback before I forge forward with it, since I'm not > totally familiar with the DM internals and where things are supposed > to go. > > Cheers, > Xavier -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "DataMapper" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/datamapper?hl=en.
