I would like to add my two cents to this discussion. You need to read, study, learn and practice this stuff about Coordinate System and projections.
You can always land up in surprise\ing situations. One thing I would like to mention here is to Split the thing in Two Aspects : DATUM and PROJECTION and understand the difference between the two. Simply stated just saying "WGS84" is not complete. It is only talking about Datum and not projections. DATUM DECIDES WHAT IS THE PRECISE LATITUDE AND LONGITUDE OF A PLACE. As per WGS84 the ZERO Longitude is NOT at Greenwhich line it is a little away. https://gis.stackexchange.com/questions/88428/why-is-the-gps-reference-meridian-100m-to-the-east-of-the-prime-meridian One needs to Know and use Datum even if you want to make a Map on a Actually Sphere / Globe. But in this case you do not need projection. PROJECTION DECIDES HOW YOU ARE FLATTENING THE SPHERE/ PART OF IT TO SEE IT ON A FLAT MAP. So in case of a Flat map You need to be careful about DATUM as well as PROJECTION. Datum is required because there were historical maps made with Datum other than WGS84. ...... This is just a simplified way but it is more complex. I am a permanent learner. Regards Naraina Damle On Thursday, April 18, 2019 at 11:08:57 PM UTC+5:30, Sharad Lele wrote: > > Devdatta's summary was short and sweet, and practical. To add to it: > > 1. The NNRMS CRS suggested seems to be in Lambert Conformal Conic > projection (with WGS84 ellipsoid and datum). An alternative to it is the > UTM projection system, which keeps longitudes parallel, and gives > reasonably accurate area estimate. The particular UTM zone one may use > varies by which part of India one is in. > 2. In common parlance, 'unprojected' means having no Coordinate Reference > System at all. In GIS parlance, 'unprojected' may be understood as > 'geographic' CRS, that is, in lat-long rather than in metres. I presume > Ashim means 'having no CRS' at all. Whether one's map needs a CRS or not > depends upon what use one wants to put it to (and hence how accurate it > must be) and its size. A map of a 60'x40' piece of land does not require a > CRS if the purpose is house construction. It may require a CRS if one is > setting up a telescope on it which will do interferometry with another > telescope 500km away. A map of even a layout or a village or small town may > not need a CRS if one wants approximate locations/directions to navigate > visually (old style). It will need a CRS if one wants to use a GPS to > navigate. > If, Ashim, you mean 'geographic' vs 'projected' system, the answer is > different: geographic is useful for representation, easy to understand > (lat-long concept), but not to be used for calculating distances and areas. > > Hope this helps. Devdatta and others: please correct/supplement. > Sharad > > On Tuesday, April 16, 2019 at 3:38:08 PM UTC+5:30, Ashim wrote: >> >> Dear All, >> >> I have a small query on similar lines. When do we use UNPROJECTED maps ? >> I understand that to go from 3D to 2D we need a projection. When is it >> reasonable to use an unprojected map? >> >> Many thanks, >> Ashim >> >> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 12:12 PM Ashim Kapoor <ashim...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> Dear Devdatta and Nikhil, >>> >>> I attended a R GIS school where the teachers were from France and they >>> were using CRS 2154. They told us that they were not familiar with the CRS >>> for Indian maps. >>> >>> I used 2154 thinking that it would not make much of a difference, but I >>> was wrong. My apologies for the confusion. When I used that on Indian ( >>> datameet ) shapefiles,I got this : map1.png ( see attachment ) >>> >>> I have also attached the R code to create these maps from the Datameet >>> District level ( 2011 ) shapefiles. I have created map2.png and map3.png >>> from crs = 3857 / 7755 respectively. >>> >>> I also found this : >>> https://epsg.io/?q=india >>> >>> Which is confusing because many CRS are there for India. Why do we have >>> so many choices of CRS for India ? >>> >>> I guess for the time being I will use 7755. >>> >>> Many thanks to Devdatta and Nikhil for their help. >>> Best Regards, >>> Ashim >>> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:42 AM Nikhil VJ <nikh...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Ashim, >>>> >>>> Pls provide the exact link of what you're referring - this stuff is >>>> never as much on the top of people's minds as we assume it to be. >>>> Do try loading your shapefiles on other tools and check there : >>>> mapshaper.org is a site that does a lot of quick, cool things with >>>> shapefiles; QGIS is a software that does everything with shapefiles. Both >>>> are free and open source. >>>> >>>> The latter will help you re-save the shapefile into any CRS you want. >>>> Right-click the layer > Save As (or "Export") and remember to choose your >>>> preferred CRS in the dropdown. >>>> >>>> Can you give background on what this CRS : *2154* : is and why you >>>> want to transform to that? Because I've only come across two main CRS's >>>> both being under the "WSG 84" category : >>>> - EPSG 4326 : this makes everything in latitude longitude >>>> - EPSG 3857 : this makes everything in meters from the equator (I >>>> think) and we need to get the data in this format when we want to do >>>> things >>>> in physical distance terms like making a 1km distance buffer or measuring >>>> areas >>>> >>>> I haven't learned GIS stuff from theory, I just use it, so don't know >>>> more details about CRS. I do understand that the dizzying multitude of >>>> CRS's out there are so because apparently GIS folks like to re-orient the >>>> center of the world (geometrically speaking) to where their data is to >>>> ensure least distortion of their shapes in the rendering. When I come >>>> across anything that's in a non-standard CRS, my first move is to >>>> transform >>>> it to either lat-longs (4326) or meters (3857). >>>> >>>> Regards >>>> Nikhil VJ >>>> >>>> >>>> On Monday, April 15, 2019 at 1:57:20 PM UTC+5:30, Ashim wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Dear All, >>>>> >>>>> I am referring to 2011_Dist. * set of shapefile. (District level >>>>> shapefiles). >>>>> >>>>> When I read them as simple features in R, ( like this ) >>>>> >>>>> map <- st_read("2011_Dist.shp") %>% st_as_sf() >>>>> >>>>> ( it's unprojected because it says 4326 in the epsg when I read the >>>>> above ) >>>>> >>>>> plot(map$geometry) >>>>> >>>>> it looks OK. >>>>> >>>>> But when I do : >>>>> >>>>> map <- st_read("2011_Dist.shp") %>% st_as_sf() %>% st_transform(crs= >>>>> 2154) >>>>> >>>>> plot(map$geometry) >>>>> >>>>> the map is TILTED. >>>>> >>>>> What is the correct projection to use for this dataset? Please clarify. >>>>> >>>>> Best Regards, >>>>> Ashim >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more >>>> about us by visiting http://datameet.org >>>> --- >>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>>> Groups "datameet" group. >>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>>> an email to data...@googlegroups.com. >>>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >>>> >>> -- Datameet is a community of Data Science enthusiasts in India. Know more about us by visiting http://datameet.org --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "datameet" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to datameet+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
