At 03:41 06/05/2001, Abhijit Menon-Sen wrote:
>On 2001-05-05 20:58:11, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > which date format are you recommending that we use as the "common
> > language"?
[snip]
> second := "00" .. "59" *( "." 1*( "0".."9" ) )
[snip]
>Comments?
Shouldn't that be
second := "00" .. "60" *{ "." 1*("0".."9") )
to deal with leap seconds?
Dave...
--
<http://www.dave.org.uk> SMS: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<plug>Data Munging with Perl <http://www.manning.com/cross/></plug>
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time modules Abhijit Menon-Sen
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time modules Rich Bowen
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time module... Abhijit Menon-Sen
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time mo... Rich Bowen
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Tim... Abhijit Menon-Sen
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Dat... srl
- Time Zones: Was Re: Grand Unifi... Rich Bowen
- Re: Time Zones: Was Re: Gra... Abhijit Menon-Sen
- Re: Time Zones: Was Re: Gra... srl
- Re: Time Zones: Was Re: Gra... srl
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Dat... Dave Cross
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of... Abhijit Menon-Sen
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time module... Peter J. Acklam
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time mo... Rich Bowen
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time module... Peter J. Acklam
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time mo... Dave Rolsky
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Tim... Peter J. Acklam
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Time mo... Eugene van der Pijll
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Date/Tim... Dave Rolsky
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of Dat... John Peacock
- Re: Grand Unified Theory of... Rick Measham
