On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Martijn van Beers wrote: > On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 01:58:59PM -0600, Dave Rolsky wrote: > > I agree that epoch is bad, because it's so limited, but it's a "standard" > > that a lot of people are familiar with, so it needs to be supported in the > > core object. > > That is exactly why it _shouldn't_ be supported. it is what people use > without thinking about. if you continue to let them do that, then it > will never stop being a standard.
While I appreciate your argument, my desire to see this code used is greater than my desire for purity. -dave /*======================= House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com =======================*/
