I still think it is a MakeMaker problem, has anyone reported it to them? I plan on adding it to the FAQ until we get it resolved properly.
-ben On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 08:24:24AM -0700, Hill, Ronald wrote: > Hi John, > > > Rather than document it, is there any way to fix the Makefile > > to have 32 1k lines instead of 1 32k line? > > I guess I was not clean as what I was refering to when I > made the statement of "Document it". What I should have > asked is "Is there a place to document the test results > that I have" Sorry, I should have been more clear. > > However, I agree the this needs to be fixed in the > makefile. > > > Having to require a specific make/gmake is really > > not a good plan. It should be very unusual to require some > > different helper utility like 'gmake' to build an > > extension to Perl when that resident 'make' can > > build Perl itself. > > > > John > > > You are absolutely correct!! > > > Ron Hill