Dave Rolsky wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Jun 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
> > sub is_positive { $_[0]->{sign} == 1 ? 1 : 0 }
> >
> > which makes a zero-duration be "not positive",
> > because sign is zero.
>
> That was an intentional change. Zero isn't positive, is it?That's right. I asked it because DT::Format::ICal tests are failing, because a zero-duration is being tested with "is_positive". BTW, do we need DT::Duration->is_zero ? - Flavio S. Glock
