My module is a superset of Joshua's... however, mine still needs the interface to be polished (I plan on adding a way to select which optional pieces of ISO8601 are legal).
Mine may also be slightly slower (but I don't think there is much in it). -ben On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 06:05:59PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote: > On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Joshua Hoblitt wrote: > > > Agreed. I think it should boil down to recurrences and durations.. If > > most people need that functionality then lets call your module > > DT::F::ISO8601 and I'll use ISO8601::Simple. If they don't then I'll > > take ISO8601 and you can use ISO8601::Complex. > > Is there any reason it can't all go in one module? I think that'd be much > easier for end users. > > > -dave > > /*======================= > House Absolute Consulting > www.houseabsolute.com > =======================*/