My module is a superset of Joshua's... however, mine still needs the
interface to be polished (I plan on adding a way to select which
optional pieces of ISO8601 are legal).
Mine may also be slightly slower (but I don't think there is much in
it).
-ben
On Tue, Jul 01, 2003 at 06:05:59PM -0500, Dave Rolsky wrote:
> On Tue, 1 Jul 2003, Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
>
> > Agreed. I think it should boil down to recurrences and durations.. If
> > most people need that functionality then lets call your module
> > DT::F::ISO8601 and I'll use ISO8601::Simple. If they don't then I'll
> > take ISO8601 and you can use ISO8601::Complex.
>
> Is there any reason it can't all go in one module? I think that'd be much
> easier for end users.
>
>
> -dave
>
> /*=======================
> House Absolute Consulting
> www.houseabsolute.com
> =======================*/
