On Tue, 2 Sep 2003, Flavio S. Glock wrote: > Dave Rolsky wrote: > > > > The "DTEND" property doesn't appear to be the allowed in the recurrence > > rules, according to RFC 2445, so I'm wondering why it's allowed as a > > parameter to the DT::E::ICal->recur method, especially since it appears to > > be the same as "until". > > I was not sure if it should be there or not, so I included it 'just in > case'. > Do you think it should be removed?
Judging by RFC 2445, yes. -dave /*======================= House Absolute Consulting www.houseabsolute.com =======================*/
