> How about to refactor DateTime RD code into another
> module? There is already enough use for rd, minutes
> and seconds in other calendars to justify having a
> "base module".

I think we've been over this before haven't we?  I thought the consensus was that a 
base class would be a good idea but that DateTime.pm should be left intact.  It makes 
more sense for a base class to 'grow up' independent of DT and if it makes sense (it's 
mature, minimal performance hit for using it, etc) DT can then be refactored to use it.

-J

--

Reply via email to