> How about to refactor DateTime RD code into another > module? There is already enough use for rd, minutes > and seconds in other calendars to justify having a > "base module".
I think we've been over this before haven't we? I thought the consensus was that a base class would be a good idea but that DateTime.pm should be left intact. It makes more sense for a base class to 'grow up' independent of DT and if it makes sense (it's mature, minimal performance hit for using it, etc) DT can then be refactored to use it. -J --