Claus F�rber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb/wrote: > There's no reason to break backwards compatibility. One could have all > three flavours of accessors:
> - $dt->xxxx([<new value>]) - modifies $dt (if new value is present) > and returns old value BTW, it would not hurt to make $dt->xxxx an :lvalue, too. Claus -- http://www.faerber.muc.de
