On Thu, 15 Jul 2004, David Wheeler wrote:

> Has a different naming convention for the two types of methods. I kind
> of like it, but only in environments where attributes are virtually
> always READ, and rarely WRITTEN. So maybe it should be:
>
>    # Perl-style
>    $d->day; # accessor
>    $d->day(1); # mutator

Let me cut off this line of discussion, because I really, really, really
hate this style of dual-purpose methods.  The reason I dislike it so much
is that it's impossible to distinguish between a mutator and an accessor
that accepts arguments to affect what it returns.



-dave

/*=======================
House Absolute Consulting
www.houseabsolute.com
=======================*/

Reply via email to