On Thu, 16 Sep 2004, Mark D. Anderson wrote: > Looking at the source code to ISO8601, it appears it has hardcoded > 'DateTime' for the constructor class everywhere. > > Ideally I would think this would be something to do at the Builder > level, so that more than just ISO8601 would benefit.
This is a special case for incomplete datetimes, really. Most formats don't support incomplete datetimes anyway. > Or, just make the core DateTime.pm module support this feature, > obviating the need for DateTime::Incomplete.... No, I don't think that's a good idea. DateTime::Incomplete adds a whole extra layer of complexity that many people won't need. -dave /*=========================== VegGuide.Org Your guide to all that's veg. ===========================*/
