On 21 Jul 2005, at 15:51, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting Rick Measham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Joshua Hoblitt wrote:
What about DateTime::Mock? Since that would make it clear that this
isn't /really/ a DT object.
Thanks Joshua,
I want to wrap this up and release so there's 24 hours to finalise
the
name. Here's the names I like thus far:
DateTime::LazyInit (from John Siracusa)
DateTime::Mock (from Joshua Hoblitt)
DateTime::Diet (original development name based on the subject)
+1 for LazyInit for plain-spokenness
-1 on the Mock, since that implies it is for testing and needs you
to stub out
the code.
[snip]
Ditto.
Adrian
