> From: Dave Rolsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Rick Measham wrote: > > > > I'd suggest we have a purpose built $self->{data} for > > hanging such stuff and > > make sure that anything in there is preserved across > > mutations and clonings. > > I really don't think this data belongs in the DateTime > object. There's > something odd about the idea that two otherwise "identical" > objects could > have different data under the hood, where one knows about an > event and one > doesn't.
Are you saying that in general you don't expect classes derived from DateTime to include additional instance data in the conventional manner (tacking it onto $self)? Thanks, - Dan Boorstein
