[Moving this to the [email protected] list]
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008, Dan Muey wrote:
I've got this new module DateTime::Duration::Human to stringify a duration in
a localizable way.
This really isn't the right name. It should go under the DateTime::Format
namespace, since it's a way of formatting DT-related data.
I was wondering if it'd be better for me to:
a) continue using DateTime::Locale and try to get the individual
maintainers add the necessary good to theri DateTime::Locale
The Locale modules are all generated from the CLDR project's data
(http://unicode.org/cldr/)
If this data includes what you need, a patch to add it to the generated
modules would be welcome ...
b) have it use a DateTime::Duration::Human::Locale group of modules and try
to get them all created
You'll have to do this if CLDR doesn't have what you need (which it
probably doesn't).
Let me know what you think, the POD-in-HTML is attached so you can have a
gander.
The one thing that jumps out is you seem to be adding a method to the
DateTime package. The DateTime.pm package already has _way_ too many
methods. If every DT-related module did this, it'd be a disaster. Just
suck it up and type it out the long way.
-dave
/*==========================
VegGuide.Org
Your guide to all that's veg
==========================*/
