Tom,
Duly noted, however I assure you that I would not be asking here if the
other avenues were fruitful. I suspect it is not much of a problem for
most users on the forum at present.
I just wish that Davinci had the support the OMAP platform seems to be
getting. Even the other DSPs DM320 DM342 etc have great forums on their
use. Im starting to wonder what benefits the Davinci has over the other
DSPs. Most people here would have paid a lot to get this far but often I
wonder what are we getting out of the SDK other than beta testing mv
linux and Davinci? I think a lot of customers were sold on the prospect
of being to get on and build their hardware and write their applications
right away.
With regards support, does anyone know exactly what the support is and
how it is obtained, when I last checked the link to this forum was all
that pretty much existed? It would have been great for the EVM to have a
site like this one (randomly googled):-
http://wiki.neurostechnology.com/index.php/Neuros_OSD
Anyways thats enough of my rant - its a love/hate relationship at the
moment!
Andrew
T Ziomek wrote:
On Wed, 16 May 2007, Andrew Armstrong wrote:
. . .
I think its about time the people at TI get to work on a proper driver,
there must be loads of people who would like some decent speed for
writing. This causes all sorts of issues when writing video to the
MMC/SD and really eats up system resources.
Can we please have a Ti response regarding this?
I obviously can't speak for TI, but keep in mind that this forum is
not an
official support venue for them. If it's a definite issue for you I'd
sug-
gest raising it with both their online support group and your local sales
and support representatives. We've done that in the past and gotten good
results.
Tom
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
