> -----Original Message----- > From: > davinci-linux-open-source-bounces+rtivy=ti....@linux.davincids > p.com > [mailto:davinci-linux-open-source-bounces+rtivy=ti....@linux.d > avincidsp.com] On Behalf Of Troy Kisky > Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2009 2:07 PM > To: David Brownell > Cc: davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com > Subject: Re: [patch 2.6.28-rc8-davinci1-git+ 0/8] EDMA > cleanup/shrinkage > > David Brownell wrote: > > On Tuesday 06 January 2009, David Brownell wrote: > > int edma_request_p_ram(int slot); > > > > ... allocates PaRAM slot not bound to a channel, returning > > that or negative errno. Negative "slot" (typical case) > > means to just choose one. > > I can't imagine wanting to request a specific reload slot. I > think no parameters would be better. >
I'd like to chime in here and state a need coming from TI's Framework Components layer - the need to allocate a range of contiguous unbound PaRAM slots. From this perspective, a single function parameter of "int num" would be sufficient. Regards, - Rob > > Troy > > _______________________________________________ > Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list > Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com > http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source > _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
