On Wednesday 11 February 2009, David Brownell wrote: > Why does this have two different code paths for the > "unlink everything that the hardware doesn't have its > mittens on" branch? > > It certainly *looks* goofy this way, and if it's not > buggy today then it'll probably grow some in the future.
Whoops, I see. The answer should have been in a comment; I'll fix that and send to Greg. Answer to my question: because one branch must advance the bulk or control queue the endpoint was on, but the other branch doesn't. _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
