On Monday 23 February 2009, Stephane Cerveau wrote: > Do you know where can I find the last official version of > musb driver where the two patch, you sent me, are integrated.
They're not yet merged in any kernel I know of, outside of (presumably) TI development trees. Those two patches are candidates for 2.6.30 merge, pending review and testing ... if they resolve this problem for you, please tell us. Confirmation that a patch works will help that process. > It seems that my driver misses a lot of patches. The current plan is to integrate through mainline, and maybe pre-merge patches queued for the next merge window into the DaVinci (or OMAP) trees. One way to look at that is aiming to have the MM or -next staging trees work for DaVinci (or OMAP) in the "normal" way. We want to get away from having DaVinci-specific patches languish in the DaVinci tree ... ditto the OMAP tree. Specific to DaVinci there are a few patches that can't yet queue to mainline, since they depend on support for new SoC chips (notably DM355) which hasn't yet been queued for mainline merge yet. I recently signed off on ten low-risk patches that I hope will be merged for 2.6.29-final ... and have about as many (including the two Ajay noted) which would be candidates for 2.6.30 (some are shoo-ins, others not). - Dave _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
