Vladimir Pantelic wrote:
> Stephen Berry wrote:
>>
>> Vladimir Pantelic wrote:
>>> Stephen Berry wrote:
>>>> the routine follows. The call to VIDENC1_control is the routine that
>>>> segfaults. I'm not using the ividEncfxns->algControl call...
>>>>
>>>> #if 1
>>>> ext_params.videncParams.size = sizeof(IMP4VENC_Params);
>>>>
>>>> hEncode = (VIDENC1_Handle) ALG_create(1, (IALG_Fxns *)&
>>>> MP4VENC_TI_IMP4VENC,
>>>> (IALG_Handle) NULL,
>>>> (IALG_Params *) & ext_params);
>>>
>>> can you tell me why you use ALG_create and not VIDENC1_create()?
>>>
>> because that is what the example did in the sdk. Is there another way?
>
> yes, but your own code has VIDENC1_create() just below in the #else
> section,
> so I was wondering why you did not use it. Actually, I have no idea
> what ALG_create actually does,
> all I ever used where the VIDEENC_xyz functions.
>
> Also, all the CE exmaple I saw so did not use ALG_create etc..
>
>
I would be more than happy to use VIDENC1_create - but it takes a param
structure of VIDENC1_Params - which doesn't support the extended
arguments that I'm trying to change.
The code that Ti supplies in the demo uses VIDENC1_create, and that
works just fine - its only when I use the ALG_create that things go bad...
There are several examples in the SDK that use the ALG_create method,
but they are so different from what I do now that it will take some
effort to figure out what I need to change... and I need to get this
unit out to a customer.
Steve
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
