Hello, I wrote:
da830/omap-L1x family parts? If not, I would lean towards keeping it
in arch/arm/mach-davinci and abstracting it out later if/when
necessary since if it really is generic, and not ARM specific,
arch/arm/common is no less appropriate than arch/arm/mach-davinci.
Come on, i8259 is generic, and yet every arch has its own driver of
this PIC. ;-)
I'm afraid that Linux jst doesn't have a proper place for the
shared PIC drivers yet...
Then, my vote would still be to keep it in mach-davinci, unless
Russell is ok with putting it in arch/arm/common.
My vote is against arch/arm/mach-davinci in any case.
Unfortunately, Russell couldn't have seen this patch probably -- my
mails keep bouncing off linux-arm-kernel list, even now that I'm
subscribed to it (now for a different reason: "server refused mail
service"). My MUSB patches are also now bouncing off David Brownell's
address. It all started after the office move. :-/
WBR, Sergei
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
[email protected]
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
