David Brownell <davi...@pacbell.net> writes:

> On Monday 30 March 2009, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> "Mark A. Greer" <mgr...@mvista.com> writes:
>> 
>> > On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 09:20:46PM -0700, David Brownell wrote:
>> >> On Saturday 28 March 2009, Mark A. Greer wrote:
>> >> > When enabled, the clocksource remains a continuous
>> >> > 32-bit counter but the clock event will no longer
>> >> > support periodic interrupts.  Instead only oneshot
>> >> > timers will be supported and implemented by setting
>> >> > the compare register to the current timer value plus
>> >> > the period that the clock event subsystem is requesting.
>> >> 
>> >> How well stress tested is that mode?
>> >> 
>> >> Thing is, it's inherently racey because the "current"
>> >> timer is counting up while you're setting the compare
>> >> register.  Maybe it incremented just after you read it.
>> >> That normally means min_delta_ns for the clockevent needs
>> >> to be at least two ticks ... ideally several more than
>> >> that, on the order of an IRQ latency,
>> >
>> > Yes, it is racey and I ran into the race when I had some
>> > printk's in it during debugging.  I bumped up
>> > clockevent_davinci.min_delta_ns until they went away.
>> > The printk's added so many artifacts that it wasn't valid
>> > testing, though.
>> >
>> >> For the record this is quite like HPET on x86, where
>> >> there's one counter (used in 32-bit mode even though
>> >> it may well support 64-bits) and a bunch of compare
>> >> registers (32 bit, almost always) to generate IRQs.
>> >
>> > I did test it doing more-or-less "normal" things but
>> > I don't believe the true min is 1ns. :)
>> >
>> > I'll do some experimenting and come up with a better
>> > value.
>> >
>> 
>> Maybe a test patch that converts dm644x, dm355, and dm646x to use a
>> single timer would allow broader testing of this as well.
>
> Wouldn't be quite the same.  Those don't actually have
> compare registers which work that way...

doh!  of course.  

Kevin



_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to