"Mark A. Greer" <mgr...@mvista.com> writes:
> Round 2.
>
> I believe I have addressed all of the issues that I agreed to address.
> Every patch has checkpatch.pl's cleanly, builds cleanly, and has been
> tested on a dm355 evm, dm6446 evm, and dm6467 evm. The last patch was
> also tested on a da830 evm.
>
> This series assumes that the following patches have been added:
>
> http://linux.omap.com/pipermail/davinci-linux-open-source/2009-March/012097.htmlhttp://linux.omap.com/pipermail/davinci-linux-open-source/2009-April/012389.html
>
Using the commit below[1] as the starting point and applying the two
patches you reference above, this series doesn't fully apply.
git am fails to apply patch 11, but forcing it makes it apply with
fuzz, suggesting we have a slightly different base. Next, patch 13
fails to apply even after forcing due to conflicts in the at24 setup.
I tried with and without the at24 patch you reference above and it fails
in both cases.
What's the base commit id of the tree you're using, before the two
commits you link to above?
Kevin
[1] commit 8a16ff458a27764d72647c4a0b57f5ec82135f88
Author: Kevin Hilman <khil...@deeprootsystems.com>
Date: Thu Mar 5 11:18:20 2009 -0800
davinci: eeprom: use new memory accessor interface
Signed-off-by: Kevin Hilman <khil...@deeprootsystems.com>
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
