Koen Kooi wrote: > On 23-05-09 01:15, Ring, Chris wrote: >> New thread, as requested... >> >> I like Rob/David's suggestion of adding calls to >> request_mem_region()/release_mem_region() in each allocator (SRAM and CMEM) > > What's the plan for getting CMEM upstream? I've been asking that > question to TI engineers for a while now and the only responses usually > are "That's a good idea!" and "We don't know if it will be accepted". > It shouldn't be too hard to get it pushed into Greg KH's staging tree... > > regards, > > Koen >
My personal bias is against CMEM being in the kernel. I dislike pools of fixed size in an general purpose allocator. I think there are better ways to solve fragmentation problems. Troy _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
