> Hans,
>
> When connecting a sensor like mt9t031 to SoC like DM355, DM6446 etc,
> driver also need to know which MSB of the sensor data bus connected to
> which host bus. For example, on DM365, we have following connection:-
>
> data 9 (MSB) of the sensor is connected to data 11 of the host bus. For 10
> bit sensor, this means, the lower 2 bits of the received data are zeros
> and for a 12 bit sensor, it has valid data.
>
> So I suggest including another field for this.
>
> unsigned host_msb:5; (8 - 15) ??
It seems very unlikely to me that someone would ever choose to e.g. zero
one or more MSB pins instead of the LSB pins in a case like this.
Or do you have examples where that actually happens?
If this never happens, then there is also no need for such a bitfield.
I think I want to actually see someone using this before we add a field
like that.
Regards,
Hans
>
>
> Murali Karicheri
> Software Design Engineer
> Texas Instruments Inc.
> Germantown, MD 20874
> email: m-kariche...@ti.com
>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Hans Verkuil [mailto:hverk...@xs4all.nl]
>>Sent: Monday, June 29, 2009 5:26 AM
>>To: Karicheri, Muralidharan
>>Cc: linux-me...@vger.kernel.org; davinci-linux-open-
>>sou...@linux.davincidsp.com
>>Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] adding support for setting bus parameters in sub
>>device
>>
>>Hi Murali,
>>
>>> From: Muralidharan Karicheri <a0868...@gt516km11.gt.design.ti.com>
>>>
>>> This patch adds support for setting bus parameters such as bus type
>>> (Raw Bayer or Raw YUV image data bus), bus width (example 10 bit raw
>>> image data bus, 10 bit BT.656 etc.), and polarities (vsync, hsync,
>>> field
>>> etc) in sub device. This allows bridge driver to configure the sub
>>> device
>>> bus for a specific set of bus parameters through s_bus() function call.
>>> This also can be used to define platform specific bus parameters for
>>> host and sub-devices.
>>>
>>> Reviewed by: Hans Verkuil <hverk...@xs4all.nl>
>>> Signed-off-by: Murali Karicheri <m-kariche...@ti.com>
>>> ---
>>> Applies to v4l-dvb repository
>>>
>>> include/media/v4l2-subdev.h | 40
>>> ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 1 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h b/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h
>>> index 1785608..2f5ec98 100644
>>> --- a/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h
>>> +++ b/include/media/v4l2-subdev.h
>>> @@ -37,6 +37,43 @@ struct v4l2_decode_vbi_line {
>>> u32 type; /* VBI service type (V4L2_SLICED_*). 0 if no
>>service found */
>>> };
>>>
>>> +/*
>>> + * Some sub-devices are connected to the host/bridge device through a
>>bus
>>> that
>>> + * carries the clock, vsync, hsync and data. Some interfaces such as
>>> BT.656
>>> + * carries the sync embedded in the data where as others have separate
>>> line
>>> + * carrying the sync signals. The structure below is used to define
>>> bus
>>> + * configuration parameters for host as well as sub-device
>>> + */
>>> +enum v4l2_subdev_bus_type {
>>> + /* Raw YUV image data bus */
>>> + V4L2_SUBDEV_BUS_RAW_YUV,
>>> + /* Raw Bayer image data bus */
>>> + V4L2_SUBDEV_BUS_RAW_BAYER
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +struct v4l2_bus_settings {
>>> + /* yuv or bayer image data bus */
>>> + enum v4l2_subdev_bus_type type;
>>> + /* subdev bus width */
>>> + u8 subdev_width;
>>> + /* host bus width */
>>> + u8 host_width;
>>> + /* embedded sync, set this when sync is embedded in the data stream
>>*/
>>> + unsigned embedded_sync:1;
>>> + /* master or slave */
>>> + unsigned host_is_master:1;
>>> + /* 0 - active low, 1 - active high */
>>> + unsigned pol_vsync:1;
>>> + /* 0 - active low, 1 - active high */
>>> + unsigned pol_hsync:1;
>>> + /* 0 - low to high , 1 - high to low */
>>> + unsigned pol_field:1;
>>> + /* 0 - sample at falling edge , 1 - sample at rising edge */
>>> + unsigned pol_pclock:1;
>>> + /* 0 - active low , 1 - active high */
>>> + unsigned pol_data:1;
>>> +};
>>
>>I've been thinking about this for a while and I think this struct should
>>be extended with the host bus parameters as well:
>>
>>struct v4l2_bus_settings {
>> /* yuv or bayer image data bus */
>> enum v4l2_bus_type type;
>> /* embedded sync, set this when sync is embedded in the data stream
>>*/
>> unsigned embedded_sync:1;
>> /* master or slave */
>> unsigned host_is_master:1;
>>
>> /* bus width */
>> unsigned sd_width:8;
>> /* 0 - active low, 1 - active high */
>> unsigned sd_pol_vsync:1;
>> /* 0 - active low, 1 - active high */
>> unsigned sd_pol_hsync:1;
>> /* 0 - low to high, 1 - high to low */
>> unsigned sd_pol_field:1;
>> /* 0 - sample at falling edge, 1 - sample at rising edge */
>> unsigned sd_edge_pclock:1;
>> /* 0 - active low, 1 - active high */
>> unsigned sd_pol_data:1;
>>
>> /* host bus width */
>> unsigned host_width:8;
>> /* 0 - active low, 1 - active high */
>> unsigned host_pol_vsync:1;
>> /* 0 - active low, 1 - active high */
>> unsigned host_pol_hsync:1;
>> /* 0 - low to high, 1 - high to low */
>> unsigned host_pol_field:1;
>> /* 0 - sample at falling edge, 1 - sample at rising edge */
>> unsigned host_edge_pclock:1;
>> /* 0 - active low, 1 - active high */
>> unsigned host_pol_data:1;
>>};
>>
>>It makes sense since you need to setup both ends of the bus, and having
>>both ends defined in the same struct keeps everything together. I have
>>thought about having separate host and subdev structs, but part of the
>> bus
>>description is always common (bus type, master/slave, embedded/separate
>>syncs), while another part can be different for each end of the bus.
>>
>>It's all bitfields, so it is a very compact representation.
>>
>>In addition, I think we need to require that at the start of the s_bus
>>implementation in the host or subdev there should be a standard comment
>>block describing the possible combinations supported by the hardware:
>>
>>/* Subdevice foo supports the following bus settings:
>>
>> types: RAW_BAYER (widths: 8/10/12, syncs: embedded/separate)
>> RAW_YUV (widths: 8/16, syncs: embedded)
>> bus master: slave
>> vsync polarity: 0/1
>> hsync polarity: 0/1
>> field polarity: not applicable
>> sampling edge pixelclock: 0/1
>> data polarity: 1
>> */
>>
>>This should make it easy for implementers to pick a valid set of bus
>>parameters.
>>
>>Regards,
>>
>> Hans
>>
>>> +
>>> /* Sub-devices are devices that are connected somehow to the main
>>> bridge
>>> device. These devices are usually audio/video
>>muxers/encoders/decoders
>>> or
>>> sensors and webcam controllers.
>>> @@ -199,6 +236,8 @@ struct v4l2_subdev_audio_ops {
>>>
>>> s_routing: see s_routing in audio_ops, except this version is for
>>> video
>>> devices.
>>> +
>>> + s_bus: set bus parameters in sub device to configure the bus
>>> */
>>> struct v4l2_subdev_video_ops {
>>> int (*s_routing)(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, u32 input, u32 output, u32
>>> config);
>>> @@ -219,6 +258,7 @@ struct v4l2_subdev_video_ops {
>>> int (*s_parm)(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct v4l2_streamparm *param);
>>> int (*enum_framesizes)(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct
>>v4l2_frmsizeenum
>>> *fsize);
>>> int (*enum_frameintervals)(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, struct
>>> v4l2_frmivalenum *fival);
>>> + int (*s_bus)(struct v4l2_subdev *sd, const struct v4l2_bus_settings
>>> *bus);
>>> };
>>>
>>> struct v4l2_subdev_ops {
>>> --
>>> 1.6.0.4
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-media"
>>> in
>>> the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
>>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>
>>
>>--
>>Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG
>>
>
>
>
--
Hans Verkuil - video4linux developer - sponsored by TANDBERG
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
