David Brownell <[email protected]> writes: > On Wednesday 02 September 2009, Siddharth Choudhuri wrote: >> I would suggest splitting the "bootloader" partition into two -- (i) ubl >> and (ii) uboot. UBL can be 5 blocks (1 + 4 spare blocks) and u-boot >> could be the rest of the blocks. One of the advantages of this approach >> is that u-boot can be upgraded/reflashed easily from within Linux using >> flash_eraseall and nandwrite. (Although, even with the current partition >> scheme, u-boot can be written, but requires erasing individual blocks >> and could be error prone). > > Heh. My suggestion is to go the other way: just a single > "bootloader" partition of eight blocks or so. Don't expose > any of the substructure at all.
I agree with Dave here. Hemant, can you respin with a single bootloader partition? Kevin _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list [email protected] http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
