thats right!
On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 6:09 PM, Andrea Gasparini <gaspar...@imavis.com> wrote: > Sameer Naik spiffera, alle Monday 15 February 2010 circa: >> At least currently i am not allocating buffers other than of size >> 829440, using CMEM, but at the same time i am not sure whether any of >> the dsp algorithms allocated memory using CMEM (by guess would be no). >> I would want this to be clarified, and whether it is safe to go with >> the second option, as it allows better memory utilisation. >> > > I can't completely catch your problem. If you know that you're using only > these 16 buffers, why can't you go with option 2 ? > Moreover, cmemk raises an error if doesn't exist a free pool to use, so the > best option is give it a try ;) > > bye. > -- > Andrea Gasparini > ---- ImaVis S.r.l. ---- > web: www.imavis.com > _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
