On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 23:20:49, Caglar Akyuz wrote: > On Monday 22 February 2010 07:37:14 pm Nori, Sekhar wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 17:06:23, Caglar Akyuz wrote: > > > On Monday 22 February 2010 10:54:08 am Raffaele Recalcati wrote: > > > > Hi Nori, > > >
[...] > > > > > > I may be mistaken here, but Arago repo is rebased, publically. So pulling > > > updates after your local changes can be a little problem. > > > > Hi Caglar, > > > > Hi, > > > We treat it as a 'staging' repository for patches lined up for upstream > > submissions so we don't flinch when squashing patches where it makes sense > > - which rewrites history. > > > > It was a mark rather than a critic. I'm using Arago tree for my work and I > find it quite useful as the way it is. Your efforts are much appreciated. > No problem. We do get this question (even internally) so I thought I will clarify why things are the way they are. Thanks, Sekhar _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
