Hi Hank, On Tue, Jul 13, 2010 at 19:28:53, Hank Magnuski wrote: > > Can someone clue me in on how support for the DM368 will be handled? > > First, have any patches been developed for this chip and if so, where? > > How will the chip be handled in the code? Will it have its own identity: > > is_a_dm368()
I don't think there is a way to differentiate DM365 from DM368 except the changed PLL settings. > > or will it have an identity as some type of DM365 variant? > Yes, cpu_is_dm365() will be true for DM368. > Has anybody patched the clock code to take advantage of the faster speeds > available with this chip? > The clock code reads the settings done by UBL and configures itself. So you slip in an updated UBL, and that should be it. I believe some changes are required in the video drivers from what has been shipping in TI releases so far, but those drivers are not upstream so the upstream kernel should not require any changes per se. Thanks, Sekhar _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
