On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 6:37 PM, S.Ghosh <ghosh.subhas...@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Nori, Sekhar <nsek...@ti.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 07, 2011 at 17:14:36, S.Ghosh wrote:
>>
>> > [SG] -- There are other modules as well which use this API (atleast
>> > audio)
>> >            Changing the sram_alloc API to allocate from the shared
>> > memory may
>> >            effect these drivers as the access latencies for shared ram
>> > and Arm sram
>> >            are different.
>>
>> None of the EVMs use IRAM audio buffers AFAIK.
>> Did you actually test audio with shared ram and found any issue?
>>
>> [SG] -- We haven't tested.
>            I was just referring to the file
> sound/soc/davinci/davinci-pcm.c,
>            Here, we use sram_alloc.
>

[SG] -- Should I change the sram_alloc to allocate from the shared memory.
           We can also try a compile time flag for this, say, if PRU is
enabled, then allocate
            from shared ram else iram.


>
>> Thanks,
>> Sekhar
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to