Ok, will do NAPI

On 02/18/2011 09:15 AM, Subhasish Ghosh wrote:
On 02/18/2011 08:07 AM, Subhasish Ghosh wrote:
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Kurt Van Dijck" <kurt.van.di...@eia.be>

...
+ /* register interrupt handler */
+ err = request_irq(priv->trx_irq, &omapl_rx_can_intr, IRQF_SHARED,
+   "pru_can_irq", ndev);
you're doing a lot of work _in_ the irq handler. Maybe threaded irq?

SG -Ok, will do

No, please use NAPI instead.

We are using h/w filters, so the number of interrupts coming into the
processor are not hogging it.
I feel that we may not require an interrupt mitigation.

As davem stated the other day, all new drivers should use NAPI.

regards, Marc
--
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 | _______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to