Hi Trinabh, Trinabh Gupta <trin...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
[...] > I just wanted to get comments on the design and understand how it > affects various architectures in question. It looks to me as if the > design should be okay and infact better for architectures like ARM > since they do not have different idle states for different cpus and > thus do not require per-cpu registration. Global registration would > work and be simpler; please correct me if I am wrong. Yes, I agree that the new design is better, I especially like that it's more clear (and expected) that final state decision making is to be done directly in the driver without the back-and-forth in the current setup. Thanks, Kevin _______________________________________________ Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source
