Rewrite the return statement in vpfe_video.c. This will prevent
the checkpatch.pl script from generating a warning saying
to remove () from this particular return statement.

Signed-off-by: Lisa Nguyen <l...@xenapiadmin.com>
---
Changes since v3:
- Removed () from return statement per Laurent Pinchart's suggestion

 drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/vpfe_video.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/vpfe_video.c 
b/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/vpfe_video.c
index 24d98a6..3b036be 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/vpfe_video.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/media/davinci_vpfe/vpfe_video.c
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ static int vpfe_pipeline_disable(struct vpfe_pipeline *pipe)
        }
        mutex_unlock(&mdev->graph_mutex);
 
-       return (ret == 0) ? ret : -ETIMEDOUT ;
+       return ret ? -ETIMEDOUT : 0;
 }
 
 /*
-- 
1.7.9.5

_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source

Reply via email to