Hi Linus,
On 02/12/2014 05:03 PM, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Grygorii Strashko
<grygorii.stras...@ti.com> wrote:
The similar GPIO HW block is used by keystone SoCs as
in Davinci SoCs.
Hence, reuse Davinci GPIO driver for Keystone taking into
account that Keystone contains ARM GIC IRQ controller which
is implemented using IRQ Chip.
Documentation:
http://www.ti.com/lit/ug/sprugv1/sprugv1.pdf
Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilim...@ti.com>
Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.wall...@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.stras...@ti.com>
---
Changes in v4:
- rebased on top of v3.14 +
[patch] gpio: davinci: signedness bug in davinci_gpio_irq_setup()
I tried applying this and it does not apply on the "devel" branch
in the GPIO tree. Since I haven't touched one line of code in the
DaVinci driver since v3.14-rc1 I seriously doubt that this is
rebased on v3.14[-rc].
Can you please rebase the patch onto v3.14-rc1 for real and
resend it?
Sorry, But I've to clarify that this patch is based on:
http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-kernel-janitors/msg18017.html
[patch] gpio: davinci: signedness bug in davinci_gpio_irq_setup()
And I did it to avoid merge conflicts between these two patches.
Is it possible to apply above one first? It's not in any of your
branches.
Of Course, I can re-base this patch on clean v3.14-rc1, but then merge
conflict will happen with "gpio: davinci: signedness.." patch.
Regards,
- grygorii
_______________________________________________
Davinci-linux-open-source mailing list
Davinci-linux-open-source@linux.davincidsp.com
http://linux.davincidsp.com/mailman/listinfo/davinci-linux-open-source