karel van ijperen wrote: >> The reason I need this is because my project will be a daemon that updates >> the [s]locate databases real time (or buffer till [s]locate is >> called and than write to the databases) this way the [s]locate database >> includes just installed files in it's search and the system does >> not suffer a performance hit when my cron deamon updates my databases.
Tikka, Sami wrote: > It sounds to me like inotify would be a better match for your project. I agree. Dazuko is mainly focussed on real-time file access control. Although Dazuko has argued that it can be used for basic event collecting, it is slowly moving away from this purpose. Future versions of Dazuko will be implemented as a stackable filesystem and really focus on file content (with less focus on file name/path). Although Dazuko would work, I think it is too much administration effort (if not now, then in the future) for your project. inotify was created to be a passive, light-weight notification mechanism. That seems much more suitable for a project that will perform low-priority DB-updates in the background. John Ogness -- Dazuko Maintainer _______________________________________________ Dazuko-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dazuko-devel
