On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 10:55:21 +0200 John Ogness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think we may still be interested in offering a FUSE-based version of > DazukoFS as a "backup". The Dazuko project has been experiencing > severe compatibility problems over the past 2 years. By providing a > FUSE-based solution, we offer a non-kernel alternative. The > alternative may be less performant and include limitations, but it is > an alternative nonetheless. Provide it as an alternative solution is fine. More solutions == better. I was confused with one paregraph which you wrote in the first email. <cite> What does this all mean? It means that I am considering changing DazukoFS to be FUSE-based rather than a stackable filesytem in the kernel. </cite> I think that switching DazukoFS completely to the FUSE is not good but keeping it as an alternative to the DazukoFS based on FiST is fine. -- Regards, Frantisek Hrbata GRISOFT, s.r.o. tel. : +420 549 524 011 mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Dazuko-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dazuko-devel
