On 2/9/08, John Ogness <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Yes, it may cause problems for distributions. I am considering adding > a kernel parameter so that Dazuko can be dynamically activated at boot > (like SElinux). Then distributions would be able to include the patch, > but leave Dazuko disabled. Users could then easily enable it with > somthing like "dazuko=1" as a boot parameter. > > The only alternative is to avoid LSM.
What about the syscall and System.map workaround, someone had suggested this at: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=207537 Maybe until 2.6.25 you come up with none LSM solution? Alon. _______________________________________________ Dazuko-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/dazuko-devel
