Hi, if we consider this issue tho we should consider completely disallowing objects with names of existing objects. I'm personally not a big fan of mandatory -MNT because there seems to be a larger amount of people using other formats.
Matthias Merkel Vice President Staclar, Inc. [https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/53/tools/email-signature-generator/icons/phone-icon-2x.png] +1-302-291-1141 | +49 15678 585608 [https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/53/tools/email-signature-generator/icons/email-icon-2x.png] matthias.mer...@staclar.com<mailto:matthias.mer...@staclar.com> [https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/53/tools/email-signature-generator/icons/link-icon-2x.png] staclar.com<https://staclar.com/> [https://cdn2.hubspot.net/hubfs/53/tools/email-signature-generator/icons/address-icon-2x.png] Munich, Germany [https://staclar.com/images/logo.png] [linkedin]<https://www.linkedin.com/in/matthias-merkel/> ________________________________ From: db-wg on behalf of Gert Doering via db-wg Sent: Wednesday, July 1, 2020 8:52 PM To: Cynthia Revström Cc: DB-WG Subject: Re: [db-wg] mntner with misleading primary key Hi, On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 07:36:53PM +0200, Cynthia Revström via db-wg wrote: > I am not sure how feasible the mandatory "-mnt" would be at this point tbh. > I can easily think of at least 2 maintainers that are actually used that I > see quite often that wouldn't fit that pattern. It would annoy me a bit, because all our stuff is under SPACENET-N and SPACENET-P ("networks and person objects"). And all tools. Of course it is doable, but... why? Convince me :-) Gert Doering -- NetMaster -- have you enabled IPv6 on something today...? SpaceNet AG Vorstand: Sebastian v. Bomhard, Michael Emmer Joseph-Dollinger-Bogen 14 Aufsichtsratsvors.: A. Grundner-Culemann D-80807 Muenchen HRB: 136055 (AG Muenchen) Tel: +49 (0)89/32356-444 USt-IdNr.: DE813185279
