Hello Hank, Same here. I am using (more than) one of the included maintainer in that dummy object. I guess blake66@ it the original creator of that dummy object, and that ak@ is the one who erased the useless object.
I have thought about doing it so, as I was also included as the maintainers of the object. The real question is: why did blake66 made such an object ? And how could we prevent something alike to happen again (not an easy question -- maybe limiting the amount of mnt-by ?) Regards, Clément Cavadore On Mon, 2024-06-17 at 07:33 +0300, Hank Nussbacher via db-wg wrote: > Hello. > > I am assuming that I am not the only one with 80+ DB updates in > their inbox this morning. > I have attached just a small sampling of 3 to this email. > Who are blak...@live.co.uk or a...@dataline.ua? > > Thanks, > Hank > -- To unsubscribe from this mailing list, get a password reminder, or change your subscription options, please visit: https://lists.ripe.net/mailman/listinfo/db-wg
