Dear colleagues, > On 1 Jun 2025, at 14:13, Piotr Strzyzewski <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi! > > Excuse my late comment. I'm catching up on a few mailing lists. > > I'd like to start by saying that I support archiving the Action List. > > That said, I have a few comments and questions. First, the "last > updated" date is clearly incorrect, as the action numbers were assigned > based on RIPE Meeting numbers, and the last entry is 66.5, which > corresponds to RIPE 66 in October 2013. Second, the list is incomplete. > There were action items after RIPE Meetings 67-71, presented by Nigel > Titley in his updates - most likely until RIPE 72 (1), when Job also did > the first NWI review. This raises the question: what is the purpose of > archiving the list? Do we intend to make it obsolete, with a disclaimer > like "don't even look here, as it's outdated and incomplete and serves > no practical purpose" or do we want to preserve it as a historical > reference? If it's the latter, then in my view, it should be as accurate > and complete as possible.
We can add a standard disclaimer to the top of the page that the content is archived. If there is no objection, I can update the page beforehand if you can send me the missing information. > (2) Lastly, it might also make sense to move > the NWI page (3) under the DB-WG section. Do you mean, move the NWI page : https://www.ripe.net/manage-ips-and-asns/db/numbered-work-items/ Under : https://www.ripe.net/community/wg/active-wg/db/ If yes, and if the WG agrees, I can move the page with a permanent redirect from the old location. Regards Ed Shryane RIPE NCC ----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/db-wg.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
