I have been a recorded contact against resources in another RIR, and I have received this class of spam. I was the titular holder/contact of a number of ranges reserved to APNIC Labs amongst other things.
I don't personally think this is a good basis to not have information in the public view. The wider community is entitled to have a path to identify who controls and operates this class of asset. The burden of spam cleaning is a cost which. has to be borne by the holder in the public interest. I realise there are other threats in this. I'm not arguing there are no downside risks to PII being associated with address management records, just that I do not think "but you will get spam" is not a strong enough reason to exclude it. (ex RIR staffer now contractor) -G
----- To unsubscribe from this mailing list or change your subscription options, please visit: https://mailman.ripe.net/mailman3/lists/db-wg.ripe.net/ As we have migrated to Mailman 3, you will need to create an account with the email matching your subscription before you can change your settings. More details at: https://www.ripe.net/membership/mail/mailman-3-migration/
