To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=44565
------- Additional comments from [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Mar 10 00:24:17 -0800 2005 ------- As I have mentioned, introducing of such an argument will not need much time. I agree that the database form is a special kind of embedded object, and didn't whant to mix it. I have just provided the writer embedded object as an example of embedded object behaviour. And a user who is used to embedded objects might expect the same behaviour from the form, that actually looks pretty like an embedded object in it's behaviour. In case of using of this new argument the design still looks for me slightly logically inconsistent, I mean if a user opens a form for editing, then all his changes should trigger the document modified flag. And if the user whants just to scroll through the document he could open the form only for viewing. >From other side not all of the designs are logically consistent, just because sometimes users do not follow logic or use different logic in their expectations. So if the solution with the new argument is more preferable I shall introduce it. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
