To comment on the following update, log in, then open the issue: http://www.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=36231
------- Additional comments from f...@openoffice.org Fri Oct 23 11:03:32 +0000 2009 ------- > This BOTH is what I ment, and for everybody not knowing the story here is > the link: > http://hsqldb.org/doc/guide/ch09.html#set_autocommit-section > so, AutoCommit is an option to the tables, No, it is a per-connection option > which must-be-used, and can not be left in default state. It is not left in default state, it is intentionally set to TRUE, to reach the current behavior, which works as designed. Before you jump onto this, let me repeat two things: a) "works as designed" doesn't mean your request isn't feasible (though I strongly disagree to your "it's useless currently" statement) b) You mix up different and completely independent terms of "commit". I explained the two different meanings above, and won't bother repeating it here. Just let me say that what you cited refers to the first meaning, and what you really request in the issue refers to the second. > And, EVEN when using HSQL as a memory-only DBMS, "statements" should not > be written to any cache, but need to be executed immidiatly You might want to read the HSQLDB document about caching (I'm sure there is some, around SET WRITE DELAY). Anyway, that's an unrelated topic. > You asked for a workflow? What do you expect, tricky stuff? A "this is what I do, this is what happens, this is what I would expect to happen" text, like it is essential for good bug reports. Please read http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/basic_rules.html#reproducibility for an explanation why it is *very* important to be sure that all involved parties have the same understanding of the matter. Written prose, in particular written by non-native speakers (no offense intended, this applies to me as well) has way too much potential for misunderstandings. > (..) > There could be other (better?) solutions to this > (..) > really? which ones? Nice example of the above :) My "could" meant "Perhaps you imagine other solutions here than I do", not "I can imagine other solutions." > you do not like moaning? Sorry, here you have it again. Sigh. This adds just noise to the issue, which makes it increasingly difficult to properly handle it, and find a common understanding. --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please do not reply to this automatically generated notification from Issue Tracker. Please log onto the website and enter your comments. http://qa.openoffice.org/issue_handling/project_issues.html#notification --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscr...@dba.openoffice.org For additional commands, e-mail: issues-h...@dba.openoffice.org
