On Wed, Oct 24, 2001 at 04:26:18PM +0100, Simon Oliver wrote:
> 
> > > The QuotedIdentifiers(boolean) attribute is required for the situation
> > > where the database might have quoted identifiers switched off (as in
> > > JDBC and MS-SQL) and could cause a sytax error.
> > 
> > Is there an ODBC equivalent to that, or would ODBC just set
> > SQL_IDENTIFIER_QUOTE_CHAR to blank in that case?
>
> Don't know - I'll run some tests.

Thanks.

> I suppose as long as the DBD knows that quoted identifiers are not in
> use it would account for this in the overrided method.
> 
> > > The reason for IdentifierColumns is to allow the DBD or user the
> > > override the default of columns 0,1,2 (catalog,schema,table) when
> > > building the identifier.
> > 
> > Is there an ODBC equivalent to that?
> Doubt it.
> 
> Say I'm running Access and I want a list of tables (but not catalog
> names) I need a nifty regexp to parse out the table name from the
> quoted, dotted identifier returnd by $dbh->tables().  Instead I just set
> IdentifierColumns = [2].

Or, since tables() is only a few lines or code, write your own.

> > > Finally, since identifiers like "myfile".""."mytable" are likely to
> > > cause an error, I modifed tables() to omit undefined columns.
> > 
> > I'd like to see documented somewhere what the correct syntax would
> > be for a table with a catalog name but no schema name.
> 
> So would I.  I can only speak from experience.  The above example does
> cause an error with MS-Access.
> 
> A few tests reveal:
> Access returns only "catalog" and "table" via ODBC / ADO-ODBC
> Access returns only "table" via ADO-OLEDB
> MS-SQL Server returns all three
> ASA returns only "schema" and "table" via ODBC / ADO-ODBC / ASAny

Sure, but that wasn't my question. I'm not too surprised that
"myfile".""."mytable" fails, but what about "myfile".."mytable"?

And what's the 'standard' way? Maybe the answer's in here:
  
http://www.jtc1sc32.org/sc32/jtc1sc32.nsf/Attachments/DF86E81BE70151D58525699800643F56/$FILE/32N0595T.PDF
but I've no time to look right now. Can you?

Tim.

Reply via email to