On Friday 16 November 2001 16:59, Arguile wrote: > Sorry if I didn't make that clear, I'm not distinguishing between views > and tables with tables(). It was system tables, system views, and > sequences that I was leaving out of the default tables() call.
My vote goes for having it as you've outlined above; we've got a local patch here to DBD::Pg that makes "tables()" also return all of the views that are available as well as we needed it for an app that we're building (and it also seems IMHO to make sense, as without it there isn't a nice way to get a listing of the views that are present). -- Graham TerMarsch Howling Frog Internet Development, Inc. http://www.howlingfrog.com // ----------------------------------------------------------------- // Time sharing: The use of many people by the computer. // -----------------------------------------------------------------
