Keep in mind that a significant performance boost is only likely if the underlying database connection protocol supports a bulk transfer either via ODBC, or with its native i/f. Does Postgres have native array binding support ?
-----Original Message----- From: "Jeff Urlwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 11:12:16 -0500 To: "Jason E. Stewart" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: RE: Array Binding Status? > As far as DBD::ODBC is concerned, it's a private patch that is in progress. > It's taken me a bit longer because of concurrent patches to the same area of > code. That, and the DBI spec isn't there, although I plan to implement as a > set of private functions. It's on my list and a patch from the latest > version (with tests) would accelerate the effort (coordination, first, > though, because I have a few other patches in progress) > > Regards, > > Jeff > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Jason E. Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, March 07, 2002 10:22 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Array Binding Status? > > > > > > Hi, > > > > What's the status of Dean's array binding hack for DBD::ODBC? Is it > > implemented and available as a private function? I'm running into huge > > performance issues with massive inserts in Postgres, and it would be > > just the sort of thing to make my life better. > > > > If it's not publicly available, can someone send me his patch? > > > > Thanks, > > jas. > > > > --
