On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 01:14:03PM +0200, Paul Johnson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 12:25:45PM +0000, Tim Bunce wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 11:38:32AM +0100, Paul Johnson wrote: > > [...] but I have found a little time to make > Devel::Cover a little more robust and to update the cpancover data. > > http://pjcj.sytes.net/cpancover/
Excellent. Thanks. [CC'd to dbi-dev] I see you have some DBD's in there but only DBD::CSV produced coverage data: DBD-CSV-0.2002 83.73 58.91 45.45 95.56 n/a 73.31 DBD-ODBC-1.09 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a DBD-Oracle-1.15 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a DBD-Pg-1.32 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a DBD-mysql-2.9003 n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a n/a DBI-1.42 73.01 52.70 43.55 82.44 48.78 64.55 It would be very helpful if the cpancover system could also record log of the tests being run so that failures and skipped tests could be seen (together with the reason for the skip) alongside the coverage results. > > > When I do get something up and running, I'll make sure the DBI is a part > > > of it. > > And it is. http://pjcj.sytes.net/cpancover/DBI-1.42/coverage.html > > It's possible that the coverage is not as high as it could since I may > not have installed various modules that would be useful. That only affected the DBD::Proxy tests. You have Net::Daemon so it was probably RPC::PlServer that caused it to be skipped. It would be great is you could add that. There are plans afoot to enhance the DBI and driver testing. These results will help us focus our efforts where it's needed most. Thanks again Paul. Tim.
